11. HISTORY – Where does the parable take place? What can you learn about the town and travel?
Re-read Luke 10:30-32. Using Study Bible notes and commentaries, what do you learn about the path between Jerusalem and Jericho?
We find that the journey between Jerusalem and Jericho was 17 miles and known for being treacherous because robbers would hide along the winding, steep paths. This made the journey a dangerous one! Jesus included a very realistic scenario in His parable. He took a real-life path that many of His audience would have been familiar with, in order to communicate the danger and peril the travelers in His story would have experienced.
12. APPLY – Reflect: What specific questions do you have upon further reflection?
If you were to tell this parable using current landmarks, what analogy would you use to describe the path (and its danger) from Jerusalem to Jericho to people today? (Example: To go from the wharf to Union Square in San Francisco, one has to walk through the dangerous Tenderloin district known for its crime.)
13. HISTORY – Who was it written about? How does the Bible describe them?
Read Luke 10:30-32, where we’re introduced to three of our four characters in the parable – a man who was attacked and two people who passed by him. What were the professions of the two men who passed by?
As Jesus explained the response of the first two individuals that passed by, we see that they were both religious men who would have known the law well (vs. 31-32). The first man to pass was a priest, who would serve in the temple offering sacrifices. The second man was a Levite, who would have assisted in the care and operations of the temple work.
14. HISTORY – What worldview, cultural, religious, political factors and experiences were a part of their world and how did that influence them?
Read Deuteronomy 15:11 and Exodus 23:4-5, which would have been Old Testament scripture these religious men would have been familiar with (and familiar scripture to the audience in which Jesus was telling the parable). Based on these scriptures, what should have been the priest and Levite’s response to the beat-up man they encountered on the road?
Both men would have known that helping the needy was an expected reaction from a religious leader, yet both acted counter to love, but not contrary to cultural expectation. Not only did they pass by the man… they passed by on the other side of the road from him!
15. APPLY – Reflect: What specific questions do you have upon further reflection?
Has there been a time in your life when you purposefully avoided a situation with someone who was different from you? What justifications did you make for your actions?
16. HISTORY – How would the original audience have heard this message?
How do you think the expert of the law would have felt as he heard Jesus speak of the priest and Levite passing by the beaten man?
17. APPLY – Reflect: What specific questions do you have upon further reflection?
Knowing this historical context, why do you think Jesus chose to use a priest and a Levite to demonstrate the point of loving your neighbor?
18. RESEARCH – Observations & Questions: What observations or questions do you have?
Who is the final person mentioned in the parable? How does the Bible describe them?
In Luke 10:33-35, Jesus introduced a third person who passed by the beaten-up man: a Samaritan who had compassion on a stranger in need. What all did the Samaritan do to help the man who had been attacked?
19. HISTORY – What worldview, cultural, religious, factors and experiences were a part of their world and how did that influence them?
Read John 4:9. Using this verse and Study Bible notes, what do we learn about the relationship between Samaritans and Jewish people?
Samaritan people had a mixed ancestry between Jews and Gentiles (non-Jews), and yet still considered themselves part of Abraham’s lineage as “true Jews.” In Genesis 12:1-3, we see that God had told Abraham that his entire family would become a great nation, be blessed, and their name would be great. This promise would have been difficult for Jews to “share” with mixed blood Jews (aka Samaritans)! And so the two groups didn’t associate with each other and in fact, were known to hate each other.
Yet the Samaritan in this parable loved and risked his life for someone who likely hated him and would have normally been considered an enemy! He even spent his own money on him: two denarii. Study Bibles and commentaries tell us that two denarii equals two day’s wages (Matthew 20:2)!
This Samaritan was never publicly rewarded for his good deed. There was no logical reason why he should help an enemy in need. This bold response stood in opposition to the typical feelings of hostility between Samaritans and Jews. To a Jew, there was no such person as a Samaritan who was ‘good.’